- Front Research
- Posts
- Why Apple is finally letting you touch a Mac
Why Apple is finally letting you touch a Mac
5-minute tech brief.
TOGETHER WITH*
100+ ChatGPT Prompts to Revolutionize Your Day
Supercharge your productivity with HubSpot's comprehensive guide to Chat GPT. This free resource is your fast track to AI mastery:
Industry-Specific Use Cases: 15+ real-world applications across various sectors
Productivity Guide: 21 best practices to 10x your efficiency with AI
Prompt Powerhouse: 100+ ready-to-use prompts for immediate implementation
Challenge Buster: Overcome common AI hurdles with expert strategies
Plus, in-depth sections on email composition, content creation, customer support, and data analysis.
*Sponsor
TECH BRIEF
Good morning, and welcome to a new week with Front Research. These are the stories setting the agenda:
Apple is set to unveil its first touch-screen MacBook Pro on Wednesday, with a macOS interface that adapts to fingers or a trackpad
OpenAI won most of Replit's $100M-plus annual AI spend from Anthropic with a discount of more than 30%
Chip-backed lending, born from a $2.3B CoreWeave loan in 2023, is on track to become a $1T credit market
Ukraine says Starlink is back to normal, and Musk now admits SpaceX did the throttling
Let's get into it.
Apple Is Set to Unveil Its First Touch-Screen MacBook Pro on Wednesday
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reports that Apple will announce OLED, touch-enabled 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models on Wednesday, October 28, via press release
macOS Golden Gate gets a "dynamic interface" that shows controls based on whether the user has recently been touching the screen or using the trackpad
A Dynamic Island replaces the notch, the machines are lighter, and they are expected to use the existing M5 Pro and M5 Max chips
Starting prices could be up to $500 above today's $2,499 and $2,999 mini-LED models, which stay on sale for now
Why it matters: Apple is reversing more than a decade of resistance to touch on the Mac, and doing it at the top of the price ladder
Bloomberg reported in Sunday's Power On newsletter that the touch-screen MacBook Pro arrives Wednesday, calling it the company's latest major reversal. According to MacRumors, Apple will announce the laptops in a press release, and invitees to a "Pro and tell" experience in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. Pacific that day will likely get hands-on time. The new models look similar to the current design but weigh less and swap the notch for a Dynamic Island. Gurman has previously said they will run the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips Apple shipped in March, and MacRumors expects starting prices up to $500 higher than the current $2,499 (14-inch) and $2,999 (16-inch) models.
The software is the more interesting part. AppleInsider summarized Gurman's description of macOS Golden Gate: controls adapt to recent input, touching a button can bring up a menu around the user's finger, and the Dock and Menu Bar have been reworked for touch. Apple is positioning touch as an extra input alongside the keyboard and trackpad rather than a replacement, and the mini-LED models will remain in the lineup for now before eventually being discontinued.
Why it matters: Mac revenue has been a steady but slow-growing line for Apple, and a premium OLED touch model is a clear attempt to pull forward upgrades from its highest-spending customers while raising average selling prices. It also narrows a long-standing feature gap with Windows convertibles from Microsoft, Dell, HP and Lenovo. Suppliers of OLED laptop panels, notably Samsung Display and LG Display, stand to benefit if volumes ramp. Watch the final pricing on Wednesday and whether Apple frames touch as a Pro-only feature or a preview for the wider Mac line.
OpenAI Wins Replit's AI Spend From Anthropic With a 30%-Plus Discount
The Information reports that Replit moved most of its AI spending from Anthropic to OpenAI after OpenAI offered a discount of more than 30% on a contract worth over $100 million a year
Anthropic reportedly declined to extend Replit's earlier discount unless Replit committed to spend more
Replit was recently one of Anthropic's top five customers; OpenAI is now the default model in Replit Agent, though Claude models remain selectable
At Rippling, OpenAI's share of coding work rose from 16% in May to 52%, while Anthropic's fell from 57% to 18%, according to the same reporting
Why it matters: the AI coding market, Anthropic's strongest franchise, is turning into a price war, and OpenAI is willing to buy share at the expense of its own margins
The Information reported on October 25, citing a person familiar with the matter, that OpenAI's discount brought most of Replit's model spending over. Coverage of the report by AI Chat Daily adds that Anthropic would not renew Replit's discount without a larger spending commitment, that OpenAI separately offered DataCamp a 40% discount to use Codex, and that Rippling's engineers shifted heavily toward OpenAI over the summer. RuntimeWire noted that none of Replit, OpenAI or Anthropic has confirmed the financial terms.
The report fills in the money behind what CEO Amjad Masad said publicly earlier this month. Per TechCrunch, Masad told the Disrupt audience on October 16 that Replit was no longer working with Anthropic, calling it "a decision based on both cost, partnership, and performance" and adding, "I think ChatGPT is better now." Because most Replit users keep the default model, switching the default is what moves the spend. Masad also said enterprise customers grew from about 2% of Replit's revenue last year to about 15% this year.
Why it matters: coding agents are among the largest and fastest-growing sources of API revenue, and a handful of platforms such as Replit, Cursor and Lovable control where much of that volume goes. If OpenAI keeps using discounts of 30% to 40% to win those defaults, Anthropic faces a choice between defending share and protecting gross margin, a tension investors will scrutinize closely. For the platforms, it confirms that model providers are now interchangeable enough to be played against each other on price, which is good for app-layer margins and bad for model pricing power.
How a $2.3B CoreWeave Loan Became the Template for a $1T Chip-Debt Market
In 2023, Blackstone and Magnetar Capital arranged a $2.3 billion loan to CoreWeave secured by its Nvidia chips and its Microsoft contracts
Bloomberg reports chip-backed lending is on track to become a $1 trillion market, with rates on some deals falling from the mid-teens to about 5.9%
Deals now include an $8.5 billion CoreWeave loan backed by Meta contracts and a $35 billion Apollo and Blackstone financing for Anthropic's chips, with Broadcom helping protect lenders
Data center tenants are also demanding more than $5 million a day in late-delivery penalties, up from $1 million this spring, per The Information
Why it matters: the AI buildout is increasingly financed by credit markets, and the collateral is hardware that loses value in five or six years
Bloomberg traced the market back to the 2023 CoreWeave loan, when Blackstone executives were still asking "What is a GPU?" According to Benzinga, which summarized the report, Blackstone and Magnetar followed with a $7.5 billion loan in 2024; CoreWeave raised $8.5 billion in March backed by Meta contracts, part of it at 5.9%; Apollo and Blackstone announced a $35 billion deal in June to finance chips for Anthropic; and Broadcom is working on a proposed $60 billion loan for a company that would buy chips and rent them to Anthropic. By August, Nvidia was working with six Wall Street firms on a plan to mobilize more than $500 billion for AI infrastructure.
Skeptics are focused on the collateral. Loans are typically repaid over five or six years, roughly the period lenders expect chips to keep their value, and Nuveen's Laura Parrott said she is holding off on large investment-grade chip deals because the structures have not been tested in a downturn. Fitch's Jason Pompeii warned of "ripple effects throughout the supply chain" if AI demand disappoints. The pressure is also showing up in construction: The Information reported that data center tenants now seek more than $5 million a day in late-delivery penalties, up from $1 million this spring, prompting brokers such as Marsh to offer new insurance. The same weekend, Apollo chief economist Torsten Slok wrote that there are no signs of an AI payoff outside the tech sector, with margins and revenue per worker flat for the S&P 493.
Why it matters: chip-backed credit lets neoclouds and AI labs grow far faster than their equity would allow, which supports orders for Nvidia and Broadcom and fee income for Blackstone, Apollo and other private credit managers. It also ties a growing slice of credit markets to GPU resale values and to a few large tenants such as Microsoft, Meta and Anthropic. CoreWeave's unsecured bonds yield about 15% while its chip-backed loans trade near face value, which shows where lenders think the risk sits. Watch for the first stress test, whether a delayed data center, a tenant that cuts back, or a faster-than-expected drop in used GPU prices.
Ukraine Says Starlink Is Restored, and Musk Admits SpaceX Did the Throttling
Ukraine's Defense Minister Yevhenii Khmara said on Saturday, October 24, that Starlink and Starshield connections are stable again on equipment moving above 400 km/h
President Zelensky said speeds are back to pre-restriction levels after more than a week of limits that disrupted drone operations
Hours later, Elon Musk said SpaceX had restricted the service because Ukraine's military "violated Starlink terms of service" with offensive drone strikes
Musk also said Starshield is "controlled by the US government"; US officials had told the Wall Street Journal that Trump asked Musk to restore service
Why it matters: a private company has now openly confirmed that it limited an allied military's battlefield communications on its own terms, a risk every defense customer will price in
Al Jazeera reported that Khmara credited talks with Washington and Zelensky's diplomacy, while Zelensky wrote that restoration began overnight and "by this morning, speeds were already sufficient." Euronews said Kyiv described the connection as "stable," and noted that Trump had said this week he would speak to Musk if access was not restored. The Wall Street Journal reported that US officials said Trump asked Musk to bring service back.
Musk's account adds a new layer. Per Al Jazeera, he said "that loophole was closed last week," arguing that Ukraine's use of Starlink for offensive strikes breached the terms of service, while also saying Ukraine's front line would "collapse immediately" if the service were turned off. That contrasts with his earlier statements that limits were set by the US military and the president, and with administration officials who said the US government did not order the restrictions. The disruption began on October 14, when, as The Record reported, troops canceled missions after terminals lost connection at drone speeds of 110 to 120 km/h.
Why it matters: Starshield is a growing government business for SpaceX, and this episode showed both how indispensable it is and how unpredictable access can be. European governments now have a concrete case for funding alternatives such as Eutelsat's OneWeb, the EU's IRIS² program and Amazon Leo. For SpaceX, which is in merger talks with Tesla, the question of who actually controls the network adds governance risk at an awkward moment. Watch for whether Congress follows through on calls for an inquiry and whether Kyiv's European backers accelerate contracts with rival networks.


Reply